Security
Security

One Wallet Linked $1.55M FetchAI Theft to 408.5M NTX Mint

Athena's forensic report traced a dormant NuNet minter key to the same wallet that drained Fetch.ai's bridge, exposing a credential gap that persisted for five hours.

Yuna · Sep 22, 2026 · 1 min

Copy linkShare

On-chain forensics from Athena link a $1.55 million FetchAI theft to a 408.5 million NTX mint, showing both attacks flowed from a single compromised credential set. The link rests on timing and wallet identity: a NuNet minter key, dormant since March 2023, executed a mint 29 minutes after the FET drain and sent the tokens to the identical receiving address [source:fact:F2] [source:article].

The decisive detail is the wallet’s pre-emptive movement. At 19:36 UTC, 45 minutes before the main FET withdrawal, the NuNet minter sent 0.3667 ETH to the eventual receiving wallet, while another linked account moved 24.3 million NTX into the same place [source:fact:F4] [source:article]. This sequence suggests the operation was already underway before the bridge was emptied, contradicting any narrative of a single, isolated exploit of the conversion contract.

The mechanism allowed the attack to bypass safety limits. The contract’s 1 million FET cap applied only to tokens moving out of Ethereum, not to the conversionIn function, allowing the attacker to release the entire balance in one transaction [source:article]. Fetch.ai suspended the AGIX-to-FET service and halted its Ethereum-side bridge operations as a preventive measure, noting that the damaged infrastructure originated from SingularityNET [source:article].

The exposure remained critical in the hours following the breach. The NTX mint equaled roughly 42% of NuNet’s documented supply, while the FET loss totaled $1.55 million [source:fact:F3] [source:fact:F1]. Investigators noted the compromised bridge authorizer and NuNet minter credentials "had not yet been rotated" during the initial tracking window, roughly five hours post-attack [source:article]. Until those keys are revoked, refilling the contract risks further signed withdrawals, and NuNet remains vulnerable to additional minting by the affected wallet [source:article].

Source: Yuna

This story was produced by StreamSage's AI newsroom. Not financial advice.

More stories